Entire Strength
Train hard. Think harder.

Fuelling

How much protein, actually, and when it stops mattering

The evidence on protein intake for lifters is unusually consistent, and it supports numbers well below what the supplement industry suggests and well above official general-population guidance.

Two beautifully cooked chicken breasts searing on a non-stick frying pan.
Two beautifully cooked chicken breasts searing on a non-stick frying pan. · Photo via Pexels
Health information notice. General information — not a substitute for professional advice. Read the full disclaimer.

Protein is the most-discussed nutrient in strength training and one of the few areas where the research has converged reasonably well. The answer is neither the very low general-population recommendation nor the enormous quantities marketed to lifters.

The number

The general recommended intake for the sedentary population is set to prevent deficiency, not to optimise training adaptation, and it is clearly insufficient for people who lift.

Across the research on resistance-trained individuals, intakes in the region of roughly 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight per day capture most of the benefit for muscle gain, with diminishing returns above that. A commonly cited meta-analysis put the point where additional protein stopped adding measurable benefit at around that figure, with a confidence interval extending somewhat higher.

Practical recommendations from sports nutrition bodies typically span something like 1.4 to 2.0 grams per kilogram for people training seriously, which brackets that finding sensibly.

For someone weighing eighty kilograms, that is roughly 130 to 160 grams a day. Achievable from food, and considerably less than the three-hundred-gram intakes that circulate in gym culture.

When you need more

In a calorie deficit. This is the main exception and it is well supported. When energy is restricted, higher protein intakes — often cited in the region of 2.3 to 3.1 grams per kilogram of lean mass — help preserve muscle. The leaner you are and the more aggressive the deficit, the more this matters.

Older lifters. Anabolic resistance increases with age, meaning a larger protein dose is required to produce the same muscle protein synthesis response. Higher total intake and larger per-meal doses are both sensible.

Very high training volumes, and periods of injury or immobilisation, where preserving tissue matters more than usual.

Distribution across the day

Total daily intake is the dominant variable. Distribution is a secondary optimisation and it is real but modest.

The evidence supports spreading intake across roughly three to five meals containing a meaningful dose each, rather than one enormous serving and several negligible ones. Somewhere around 0.4 grams per kilogram per meal is a commonly used target for maximising the synthesis response per feeding.

The idea of a narrow anabolic window immediately after training has not held up well. The window is more like several hours wide, and for anyone who has eaten protein within a few hours of training, the urgency of the post-workout shake is overstated.

What does have reasonable support is a protein dose before sleep, which appears to increase overnight muscle protein synthesis. Slow-digesting sources like casein or dairy are the usual recommendation.

Quality and source

Protein quality depends on the essential amino acid profile, particularly leucine, which appears to act as a trigger for the synthesis response, and on digestibility.

Animal sources — dairy, eggs, meat, fish — are complete and highly digestible. Whey is fast-absorbing and leucine-rich, which is why it dominates supplements.

Plant sources are generally lower in one or more essential amino acids and somewhat less digestible. This is entirely manageable: eat a variety of plant proteins across the day, and increase total intake somewhat to compensate. Soy, pea and combinations of legumes with grains all work. Vegan lifters build plenty of muscle; they just need to be more deliberate about it.

Supplements

Protein powder is food in a convenient form. It is not superior to food and it has no special properties. If you meet your intake from meals, you do not need it; if you struggle to, it is a practical and cheap solution.

Individual amino acid supplements — branched-chain amino acids in particular — have poor evidence for anyone consuming adequate total protein. They are an expensive way to buy a fraction of what a normal meal provides.

The concerns that come up

The claim that high protein damages healthy kidneys does not have support. Controlled studies in people with normal kidney function at high intakes over extended periods do not show harm. People with existing kidney disease are a different case and should follow medical advice.

Bone health concerns based on old acid-load theories have similarly not held up; if anything, higher protein intake is associated with better bone density when calcium intake is adequate.

The honest summary

Get to roughly 1.6 to 2.2 grams per kilogram from mostly whole foods, spread across three or four meals, higher when dieting, and stop thinking about it.

The returns on further protein optimisation are tiny compared with the returns on training consistently, sleeping properly and eating enough total energy — which is the variable most under-eating lifters are actually short of.

Hiro Tanabe
Sports Science Writer, Entire Strength

Hiro has a background in exercise physiology and a habit of reading the methods section first. He is the reason this site rarely reports a single study as news.

More from Hiro →

Also by Hiro Tanabe

Fuelling

Training and eating on the road

Travel disrupts routine more than almost anything else. A plan that survives a week away is more valuable than an optimal plan that does not.

Devon Abara··3 min read

Strength Science

What we still do not know

A survey of the open questions in strength training, which is a more useful thing to read than another confident answer to a settled one.

Hiro Tanabe··3 min read